See AboutThesePages.

Contents

Notes

Resources

See ResourceRecommendations. Feel free to add additional resources to these lists, but please follow the guidelines on ResourceRecommendations including ResourceRecommendations#Guidelines_for_Rating_Resources.

Recommended

• (rhk) Understanding the Windows EAL4 Evaluation; Jonathan S. Shapiro, PhD; viewed 22 Nov 2002 --

An EAL4 rating means that you did a lot of paperwork related to the software process, but says absolutely nothing about the quality of the software itself. There are no quantifiable measurements made of the software, and essentially none of the code is inspected. Buying software with an EAL4 rating is kind of like buying a home without a home inspection, only more risky.

• (rhk) [[][]] --

Recommended for Specific Needs

• (rhk) [[][]] --

Recommended by Others

• (rhk) Win32 API utterly and irredeemably broken, The Register; Thomas C Greene; 07/08/2002 -- How Windows is controlled by messages which can come from any source (sort of an expansion on why the concept of users and permissions exists in *nix).

<Currently, no significant content below this line.>

No Recommendation

• (rhk) [[][]] --

Not Recommended

• (rhk) [[][]] --

Contributors

• () RandyKramer - 07 Aug 2002
• <If you edit this page: add your name here; move this to the next line; and include your comment marker (initials), if you have created one, in parenthesis before your WikiName.>

[[Main.RandyKramer#07 Aug 2002][]]

Page Ratings